Jim Jordan Predicts Third Trump Impeachment If Democrats Win House
Jim Jordan Says a Third Trump Impeachment Is Coming — Here's What's Really Going On
If you've been following U.S. politics even loosely, you know impeachment isn't exactly new territory for Donald Trump. He was impeached twice during his first term. Now, with midterm elections coming up in November, Republican Rep. Jim Jordan is warning that a third one could be on the way — and he's putting the blame squarely on Democrats.
So what did Jordan actually say?
Speaking recently, Jordan predicted that Democrats will impeach President Trump for a third time if they take control of the House after the November midterm elections. His exact words? "They say they're not going to, but we know they will –– they'll do a third impeachment of President Trump." The HillThe Hill
This isn't the first time he's said it either. A few weeks earlier, in an interview, Jordan warned that Americans could expect another impeachment along with setbacks on border security if Democrats retake the House. He also pointed to a specific detail: Democrats reportedly plan to replace Jerry Nadler with Jamie Raskin as the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, which Jordan sees as a sign they're gearing up to "run the impeachment against President Trump the more traditional way." Exclusive +2
Is this actually likely?
Here's where it gets interesting — the political forecasts and the Democrats' own public statements tell a slightly different story than Jordan's warnings suggest.
On the numbers side, Decision Desk HQ's forecast currently gives Democrats a 72 percent probability of winning back the House in November. So the "if Democrats take the House" part of Jordan's prediction isn't a huge stretch. The Hill
But whether they'd actually move to impeach again is a different question. According to reporting from earlier this year, most Democrats aren't clamoring for a third impeachment attempt after doing it twice during their last stint in the majority. House Democratic Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar was blunt about it, saying basically no Democrats are even discussing the idea internally. Party leadership has framed impeachment talk as a distraction, with moderates wanting to focus on economic issues instead. punchbowlpunchbowl
There's also a practical reality check here: even if Democrats did win the House, getting the 67 votes needed to actually convict Trump in the Senate remains very unlikely, since that would require significant Republican support. punchbowl
But the calculus could shift
That said, it's not a flat "no" either. More recent reporting suggests the situation could change once Democrats see whether they actually win the majority in November, and Democrats already have several Trump actions they view as impeachable, including the U.S. military strike in Venezuela that led to the capture of its head of state. Leadership just doesn't want to make that call before the election results are in. The Washington PostThe Washington Post
Trump himself seems to be taking the threat seriously too — he's reportedly told fellow Republicans that keeping the House is essential, or he could be staring down impeachment number three.
Bottom line
So is Jim Jordan right? Partly. The odds of Democrats winning the House are genuinely decent. But the idea that they're rushing toward a third impeachment the moment they get the gavel back seems more like political messaging from Jordan than where Democratic leadership actually stands right now. It's a "watch this space" situation — the real test comes after November's results are in.

Post a Comment